JMMF vs. BBUS
JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. JMMF is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMMF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
JMMF vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMMF achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.57% return.
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.62%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
JMMF vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.63% | 0.17% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.57% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMMF and BBUS is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMMF vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
JMMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBUS
JMMF vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMMF | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMMF vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMMF drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMMF and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMMF | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -35.35% | +35.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.47% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -5.43% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility
JMMF vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMMF | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51% | 12.59% | -12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 17.14% | -16.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.51% | 19.59% | -19.08% |
JMMF vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMMF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMMF vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
JMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than BBUS's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMMF and BBUS have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for JMMF.
JMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.
JMMF is categorized as Money Market, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for JMMF and 0.02% for BBUS.
Find the right allocation for JMMF and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer