PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMID vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMID vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMID achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -5.14% return.


JMID

1D
-0.75%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
5.78%
6M
3.60%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
18.45%
1M
181.70%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
2.86%
1Y
236.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMID vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
5.78%5.56%11.33%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-5.14%-44.36%-90.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JMID and SMST is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMID vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMID
JMID Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
JMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMID Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMID Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMID vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMIDSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.30

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

2.79

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.66

5.52

-2.85

JMID vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMID and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMID vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMID drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMID and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMIDSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-99.25%

+73.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-85.39%

+74.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-96.27%

+91.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-90.74%

+86.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

43.15%

-39.85%

Volatility

JMID vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) is 5.32%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 46.13%. This indicates that JMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMIDSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

46.13%

-40.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

130.40%

-117.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

146.32%

-129.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

167.25%

-145.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

167.25%

-145.72%

JMID vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMID has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMID vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

JMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.66%0.75%0.10%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMID and SMST have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (46.13%) compared to JMID (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMID dropped -25.58% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 236.89% vs 8.78% for JMID. On fees, JMID is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JMID has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 236.89% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMID is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

JMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

JMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMID and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMID and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer