JMID vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

JMID (Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. JMID is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. JMID charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

JMID vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JMID

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 5.94%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.27%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JMID Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF	$329.64K	$183.06K	$187.31K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JMID vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JMID Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF	8.44%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

JMID vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMID	QQQN
Technology	34.2%	47.3%
Industrials	19.2%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.4%	13.7%
Healthcare	11.7%	19.9%
Financial Services	6.7%	-
Communication Services	4.8%	5.5%
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.9%
Real Estate	2.1%	-
Energy	1.8%	-
Utilities	1.5%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	1.4%

Return for Risk

JMID vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JMID

JMID Risk / Return Rank: 21
JMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
JMID Omega Ratio Rank: 19
JMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
JMID Martin Ratio Rank: 25

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JMID vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMID	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.13	—	—

Drawdowns

JMID vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMID drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMID and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMID	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.58%	0.00%	-25.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	0.00%	-2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	0.00%	-4.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JMID	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.26%	0.00%	+17.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.29%	0.00%	+21.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.29%	0.00%	+21.29%

JMID vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMID has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMID vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

JMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
JMID Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF	0.57%	0.75%	0.10%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, JMID or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMID or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMID or QQQN?

JMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between JMID and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMID and 0.18% for QQQN.