PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMID vs. JBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMID vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMID achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than JBBB's 1.86% return.


JMID

1D
0.81%
1M
4.35%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.00%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JBBB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.30%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMID vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
10.46%5.56%11.37%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
1.86%5.43%5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JMID and JBBB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMID vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMID
JMID Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMID Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMID Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMID vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMIDJBBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.26

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

7.66

-3.24

JMID vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the JBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMID and JBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMIDJBBBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.67

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.30

-0.53

Drawdowns

JMID vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMID drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, which is greater than JBBB's maximum drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMID and JBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMIDJBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.58%

-10.57%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-2.46%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-1.58%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

0.72%

+2.50%

Volatility

JMID vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) at 0.45%. This indicates that JMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMIDJBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

0.45%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

2.76%

+9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

3.34%

+13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

5.26%

+16.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

5.26%

+16.32%

JMID vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMID has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMID vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

JMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than JBBB's 7.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.13%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%
JMID
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.63%0.75%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMID and JBBB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMID has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to JBBB (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMID dropped -25.58% vs JBBB's -10.57%.

On 1-year performance, JMID leads with 14.19% vs 5.54% for JBBB. On fees, JMID is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JBBB has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JMID has performed better with a 14.19% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMID is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 0.63% for JMID.

JMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JBBB is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JMID and 0.49% for JBBB.

JBBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMID and JBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer