PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMHI vs. HELO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMHI vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than HELO's 2.52% return.


JMHI

1D
0.05%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.62%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HELO

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.52%
6M
3.21%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMHI vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JMHI
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF
1.56%4.60%5.92%6.53%
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
2.52%7.82%18.05%6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JMHI and HELO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.17

JMHI vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMHI
HELO

Technology

29.0%
39.8%

Healthcare

14.5%
8.2%

Financial Services

12.3%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
11.6%

Industrials

9.0%
6.0%

Communication Services

7.8%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.5%

Energy

4.9%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.8%

Utilities

2.2%
2.5%

Technology

JMHI
29.0%
HELO
39.8%

Healthcare

JMHI
14.5%
HELO
8.2%

Financial Services

JMHI
12.3%
HELO
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JMHI
10.6%
HELO
11.6%

Industrials

JMHI
9.0%
HELO
6.0%

Communication Services

JMHI
7.8%
HELO
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

JMHI
5.2%
HELO
3.5%

Energy

JMHI
4.9%
HELO
3.3%

Basic Materials

JMHI
2.4%
HELO
1.5%

Real Estate

JMHI
2.3%
HELO
1.8%

Utilities

JMHI
2.2%
HELO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMHI vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMHI
JMHI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMHI vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMHIHELODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

1.89

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.65

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.05

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.55

9.10

-1.55

JMHI vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMHI and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMHIHELODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.89

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.65

-0.60

Drawdowns

JMHI vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and HELO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMHIHELODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-10.89%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-5.76%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.07%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-1.18%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.30%

-0.46%

Volatility

JMHI vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) at 0.66%. This indicates that JMHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMHIHELODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.66%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

5.00%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

6.20%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

7.96%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

7.96%

-3.46%

JMHI vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMHI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMHI vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than HELO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
0.62%0.67%0.60%0.19%
JMHI
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF
4.54%4.42%4.49%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMHI and HELO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMHI has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to HELO (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMHI dropped -7.11% vs HELO's -10.89%.

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 11.65% vs 6.44% for JMHI. On fees, JMHI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HELO has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMHI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.

JMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.

JMHI is categorized as High Yield Muni, while HELO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JMHI and 0.50% for HELO.

JMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMHI and HELO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer