JMHI vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

JMHI (JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMHI is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JMHI returned 6.56% vs 55.80% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. JMHI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

JMHI vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 13.94% return.

JMHI

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BESF

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 55.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMHI vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF	2.29%	4.79%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	13.94%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between JMHI and BESF is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.24

Return for Risk

JMHI vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMHI

JMHI Risk / Return Rank: 68
JMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
JMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
JMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
JMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 81
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMHI vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMHI	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.28	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.08	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	5.11	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.81	13.92	-6.10

JMHI vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMHI and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMHI vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMHI	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-10.97%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-10.97%	+8.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.44%	+10.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-2.77%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	4.02%	-3.18%

Volatility

JMHI vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) is 0.80%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that JMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMHI	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	7.11%	-6.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.37%	15.05%	-12.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17%	24.70%	-21.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.46%	24.43%	-19.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.46%	24.43%	-19.97%

JMHI vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMHI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMHI vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than BESF's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.97%	6.39%	0.00%	0.00%
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF	4.51%	4.42%	4.49%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMHI and BESF in my portfolio?

JMHI and BESF have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMHI or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to JMHI (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMHI dropped -7.11% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, JMHI or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 55.80% vs 6.56% for JMHI. On fees, JMHI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JMHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMHI or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 55.80% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMHI or BESF?

JMHI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMHI or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 4.51% for JMHI.

What is the main difference between JMHI and BESF?

JMHI is categorized as High Yield Muni, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JMHI and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.