JMGRX vs. TAAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Enterprise Fund Class I (JMGRX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX).
JMGRX is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap® Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 1992. TAAGX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Oct 5, 2000.
Performance
JMGRX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JMGRX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMGRX Janus Enterprise Fund Class I | -5.96% | 7.66% | 15.28% | 18.03% | -15.99% | 17.07% | 20.43% | 35.28% | -0.88% | 26.36% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.71% | 16.01% | 25.45% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 27.71% | -12.17% | 19.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMGRX achieves a -5.96% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, JMGRX has underperformed TAAGX with an annualized return of 11.60%, while TAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
JMGRX
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -5.70%
- YTD
- -5.96%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
TAAGX
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JMGRX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMGRX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JMGRX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank
JMGRX
TAAGX
JMGRX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Enterprise Fund Class I (JMGRX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMGRX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 2.01 | -1.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 2.66 | -2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 4.06 | -3.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.57 | 17.43 | -15.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMGRX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 2.01 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.49 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.23 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between JMGRX and TAAGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JMGRX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison
JMGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%, more than TAAGX's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMGRX Janus Enterprise Fund Class I | 7.93% | 7.46% | 6.97% | 7.46% | 10.42% | 15.91% | 8.44% | 4.47% | 6.42% | 1.77% | 1.81% | 3.63% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 3.10% | 3.44% | 8.81% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
Drawdowns
JMGRX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMGRX drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, smaller than the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMGRX and TAAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMGRX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.48% | -62.13% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -12.13% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -34.47% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.25% | -34.47% | -3.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.99% | -5.56% | -3.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -18.82% | +13.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.83% | +0.77% |
Volatility
JMGRX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Enterprise Fund Class I (JMGRX) is 5.41%, while Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that JMGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JMGRX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 9.62% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 16.80% | -6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 24.69% | -6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 22.94% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 22.02% | -3.35% |