PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMGIX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Managed Income Fund (JMGIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMGIX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, JMGIX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 2.45%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.


JMGIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.62%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
2.45%

FFANX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.59%
6M
8.05%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
6.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMGIX
JPMorgan Managed Income Fund
1.27%4.87%5.36%4.18%1.13%0.05%1.32%3.02%2.07%1.30%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.59%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JMGIX and FFANX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.10

Over the past year, JMGIX and FFANX have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMGIX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMGIX
JMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Income Fund (JMGIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMGIXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.40

1.47

+0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.42

3.27

+7.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.76

13.93

+33.82

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMGIX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMGIX drawdown since its inception was -2.18%, smaller than the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMGIX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMGIXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-31.69%

+29.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.40%

-5.20%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.40%

-7.55%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.70%

-18.52%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.18%

-18.52%

+16.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-3.79%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

1.22%

-1.13%

Volatility

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Managed Income Fund (JMGIX) is 0.42%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that JMGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMGIXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

3.02%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.98%

6.03%

-5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

7.07%

-5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.29%

7.94%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.06%

7.74%

-6.68%

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMGIX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMGIX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

JMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
JMGIX
JPMorgan Managed Income Fund
4.15%4.34%5.11%3.77%1.32%0.45%1.31%2.58%2.15%1.39%0.11%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMGIX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFANX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to JMGIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMGIX dropped -2.18% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

JMGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMGIX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer