PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBS vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBS vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBS achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 91.06% return.


JMBS

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-1.06%
YTD
-0.47%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.13%

UGA

1D
-0.01%
1M
14.56%
6M
70.02%
YTD
91.06%
1Y
88.12%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
25.78%
10Y*
18.03%
ALL TIME*
4.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.93M$27.70M$29.57M
$6.47M$5.01M$4.85M

JMBS vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
-0.47%8.82%1.53%5.66%-11.40%-0.32%5.80%7.11%1.55%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
91.06%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBS and UGA is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JMBS and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.40, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBS vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JMBS vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMBSUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

4.12

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

11.57

-7.64

JMBS vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBS and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMBS vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBS drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBS and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBSUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-86.59%

+69.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-20.32%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.67%

-26.68%

+20.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

-38.11%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-5.63%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-36.53%

+32.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

7.26%

-6.14%

Volatility

JMBS vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) is 1.21%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that JMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBSUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

11.28%

-10.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.48%

31.98%

-28.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

36.11%

-31.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

34.60%

-28.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

37.26%

-31.76%

JMBS vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBS has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBS vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

JMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.30%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBS and UGA have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to JMBS (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMBS dropped -16.68% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 25.78% vs 0.44% for JMBS. On fees, JMBS is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, JMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMBS is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

JMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for JMBS and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBS and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer