PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMABX vs. VTCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMABX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's 10.92% return.


JMABX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.12%
6M
0.74%
YTD
0.74%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*

VTCLX

1D
0.86%
1M
1.78%
6M
8.74%
YTD
10.92%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
15.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
0.74%8.88%4.42%8.05%-15.50%0.33%7.74%2.72%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
10.92%17.44%23.76%26.62%-19.07%26.87%21.08%8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JMABX and VTCLX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019

0.16

Over the past year, JMABX and VTCLX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMABX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMABX
JMABX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JMABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMABX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
JMABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMABX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VTCLX
VTCLX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VTCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VTCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMABXVTCLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.49

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

10.99

-4.78

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VTCLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMABX and VTCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMABX drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, smaller than the maximum VTCLX drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMABX and VTCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMABXVTCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.48%

-55.18%

+33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-8.79%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.71%

-19.01%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-24.98%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.35%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-7.54%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.99%

-1.16%

Volatility

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) is 0.93%, while Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that JMABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMABXVTCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

4.27%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

10.03%

-7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

12.66%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.52%

17.32%

-11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

18.25%

-12.40%

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMABX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VTCLX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMABX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison

JMABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than VTCLX's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMABX
John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio
5.64%5.59%5.26%3.59%3.28%3.99%2.74%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
0.90%0.93%1.04%1.24%1.47%1.04%1.32%1.52%1.83%1.57%1.76%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMABX and VTCLX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTCLX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to JMABX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMABX dropped -21.48% vs VTCLX's -55.18%.

VTCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMABX and VTCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer