JLQD vs. QCON

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JLQD (Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. JLQD is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. JLQD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.

Performance

JLQD vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JLQD

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: 5.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLQD vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	-0.39%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

JLQD vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JLQD	QCON
Financial Services	2.8%	7.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

JLQD vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLQD

JLQD Risk / Return Rank: 47
JLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
JLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 47
JLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLQD vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLQD	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLQD	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	—	—

Drawdowns

JLQD vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLQD	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.17%	0.00%	-21.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	0.00%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	0.00%	-8.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JLQD	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	0.00%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.32%	0.00%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.32%	0.00%	+6.32%

JLQD vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLQD vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF	5.44%	5.28%	5.36%	3.99%	2.77%	0.83%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, JLQD or QCON?

On fees, JLQD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JLQD or QCON?

JLQD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JLQD or QCON?

JLQD has the higher dividend yield at 5.44%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between JLQD and QCON?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JLQD and 0.32% for QCON.