PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLQD vs. MILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLQD vs. MILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLQD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than MILK's 2.18% return.


JLQD

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.13%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
10Y*

MILK

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.10%
YTD
2.18%
6M
1.55%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLQD vs. MILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
0.24%7.77%-0.20%
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
2.18%7.49%-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JLQD and MILK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.92

The correlation between JLQD and MILK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLQD vs. MILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLQD
JLQD Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MILK
MILK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLQD vs. MILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLQDMILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.47

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

8.90

-1.27

JLQD vs. MILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLQD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the MILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLQD and MILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLQDMILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.78

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.97

-0.95

Drawdowns

JLQD vs. MILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than MILK's maximum drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and MILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLQDMILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-6.16%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-3.75%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.24%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-1.09%

-7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.04%

-0.22%

Volatility

JLQD vs. MILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) is 1.25%, while Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that JLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLQDMILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.58%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

3.78%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

5.21%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

6.69%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

6.69%

-0.37%

JLQD vs. MILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MILK's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLQD vs. MILK - Dividend Comparison

JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than MILK's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
5.44%5.28%5.36%3.99%2.77%0.83%
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
7.04%6.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JLQD and MILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MILK has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to JLQD (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLQD dropped -21.17% vs MILK's -6.16%.

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 9.23% vs 6.25% for JLQD. On fees, JLQD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JLQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JLQD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 5.44% for JLQD.

JLQD tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index, while MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JLQD and 0.49% for MILK.

MILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLQD and MILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer