JLQD vs. FLDR
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR).
JLQD and FLDR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JLQD is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 8, 2021. FLDR is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2018. Both JLQD and FLDR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
JLQD vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JLQD vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | -0.63% | 7.77% | 3.21% | 8.76% | -15.99% | -1.25% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 0.61% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLQD achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 0.61% return.
JLQD
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JLQD vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
JLQD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JLQD vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
JLQD
FLDR
JLQD vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JLQD | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 4.45 | -3.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 6.66 | -5.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 2.16 | -0.99 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 5.87 | -4.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 30.56 | -26.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JLQD | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 4.45 | -3.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.60 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between JLQD and FLDR is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JLQD vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
JLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than FLDR's 4.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLQD Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | 5.37% | 5.28% | 5.36% | 3.99% | 2.77% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.55% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
JLQD vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLQD drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLQD and FLDR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLQD | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.17% | -12.23% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.57% | -0.76% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.19% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -0.36% | -8.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.15% | +0.91% |
Volatility
JLQD vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF (JLQD) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.42%. This indicates that JLQD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JLQD | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 0.42% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 0.57% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.03% | 0.98% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 1.21% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 5.32% | +1.07% |