PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLPSX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund (JLPSX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLPSX achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, JLPSX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 16.20%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


JLPSX

1D
2.25%
1M
-0.44%
6M
5.01%
YTD
6.08%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
16.20%
ALL TIME*
12.77%

MUHLX

1D
0.59%
1M
2.71%
6M
4.85%
YTD
11.61%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
10.68%
ALL TIME*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLPSX
JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund
6.08%14.83%37.27%29.98%-18.34%28.75%26.10%29.96%-7.15%21.43%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
11.61%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%14.39%-13.29%18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JLPSX and MUHLX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2005

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between JLPSX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLPSX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLPSX
JLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
JLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund (JLPSX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLPSXMUHLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

2.18

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

6.46

-1.74

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLPSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLPSX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLPSX drawdown since its inception was -51.33%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLPSX and MUHLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLPSXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.33%

-62.05%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-10.23%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-18.63%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.68%

-18.63%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.09%

-40.85%

+5.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-3.48%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-10.75%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.45%

-0.75%

Volatility

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund (JLPSX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) at 2.72%. This indicates that JLPSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLPSXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

2.72%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

10.95%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

14.51%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

14.49%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

17.04%

+5.34%

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLPSX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLPSX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

JLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than MUHLX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLPSX
JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus Fund
2.81%2.98%12.87%11.67%32.43%28.14%28.69%22.82%17.84%13.85%4.73%9.24%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
2.99%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLPSX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLPSX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to MUHLX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLPSX dropped -51.33% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

MUHLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLPSX and MUHLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer