PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLMRX vs. AOBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLMRX achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than AOBLX's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, JLMRX has underperformed AOBLX with an annualized return of 5.71%, while AOBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.


JLMRX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.33%
6M
3.55%
YTD
5.23%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
5.71%
ALL TIME*
5.47%

AOBLX

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.74%
6M
9.06%
YTD
11.89%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
9.76%
ALL TIME*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLMRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
5.23%11.91%7.45%11.20%-13.79%7.42%10.21%16.25%-3.93%8.36%
AOBLX
Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A
11.89%19.59%9.46%15.00%-14.64%15.10%13.15%21.75%-4.63%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between JLMRX and AOBLX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.91

The correlation between JLMRX and AOBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLMRX vs. AOBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLMRX
JLMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JLMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JLMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AOBLX
AOBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AOBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AOBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLMRXAOBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.88

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

16.64

-7.17

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the AOBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLMRX and AOBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLMRX drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum AOBLX drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLMRX and AOBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLMRXAOBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-36.70%

+16.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-6.42%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-13.52%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.46%

-20.48%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.60%

-24.31%

+3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-2.42%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-3.80%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.49%

-0.37%

Volatility

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JLMRX) is 1.77%, while Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) has a volatility of 2.39%. This indicates that JLMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLMRXAOBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

2.39%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.35%

7.96%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.36%

10.14%

-3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.32%

11.16%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.53%

11.34%

-2.81%

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLMRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AOBLX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLMRX vs. AOBLX - Dividend Comparison

JLMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than AOBLX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOBLX
Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A
3.23%3.48%2.28%1.52%2.97%8.33%4.31%5.78%9.70%9.22%2.51%3.97%
JLMRX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio
3.01%3.13%3.06%3.05%6.73%5.05%4.11%5.53%6.16%2.18%2.98%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JLMRX and AOBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AOBLX has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to JLMRX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLMRX dropped -20.60% vs AOBLX's -36.70%.

AOBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLMRX and AOBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer