PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKYX vs. PMTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKYX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than PMTIX's 6.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JLKYX has outperformed PMTIX with an annualized return of 11.62%, while PMTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.80% annualized return.


JLKYX

1D
0.48%
1M
5.49%
YTD
12.94%
6M
13.74%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.62%

PMTIX

1D
0.26%
1M
2.99%
YTD
6.02%
6M
6.25%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
12.94%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%
PMTIX
Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund
6.02%13.25%12.86%15.11%-16.81%12.70%14.71%22.40%-7.45%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKYX and PMTIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.97

The correlation between JLKYX and PMTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLKYX vs. PMTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PMTIX
PMTIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PMTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PMTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLKYXPMTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.09

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

3.01

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.71

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.36

12.06

+2.30

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the PMTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKYX and PMTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLKYXPMTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.09

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.60

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.79

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.49

+0.16

Drawdowns

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKYX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, smaller than the maximum PMTIX drawdown of -52.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKYX and PMTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKYXPMTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-52.14%

+19.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-5.85%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-9.62%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-23.05%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

-25.87%

-6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-6.79%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.31%

+0.75%

Volatility

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund (PMTIX) at 2.40%. This indicates that JLKYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLKYXPMTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

2.40%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

6.15%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

7.61%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

10.55%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

11.22%

+4.99%

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JLKYX and PMTIX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JLKYX vs. PMTIX - Dividend Comparison

JLKYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than PMTIX's 9.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.19%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%
PMTIX
Principal LifeTime 2030 Fund
9.14%9.69%9.60%4.26%10.05%8.87%6.37%6.49%8.21%5.87%3.97%9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, JLKYX and PMTIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to PMTIX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKYX dropped -32.55% vs PMTIX's -52.14%.

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLKYX and PMTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer