PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLKYX vs. FKGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6 (FKGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKYX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than FKGLX's 11.15% return.


JLKYX

1D
0.48%
1M
5.49%
YTD
12.94%
6M
13.74%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
11.62%

FKGLX

1D
0.45%
1M
4.18%
YTD
11.15%
6M
12.60%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
12.94%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%7.12%
FKGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6
11.15%21.77%16.27%19.02%-17.89%16.35%17.80%27.00%-8.05%7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKYX and FKGLX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.98

The correlation between JLKYX and FKGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLKYX vs. FKGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FKGLX
FKGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FKGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6 (FKGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLKYXFKGLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.32

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

3.23

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.98

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.36

12.97

+1.38

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FKGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKYX and FKGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLKYXFKGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.32

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.69

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.74

-0.08

Drawdowns

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKYX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FKGLX drawdown of -31.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKYX and FKGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLKYXFKGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-31.23%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.82%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-13.78%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-27.05%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-5.43%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.02%

+0.04%

Volatility

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) is 3.55%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6 (FKGLX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that JLKYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLKYXFKGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.87%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

9.36%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

11.36%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

14.33%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

15.70%

+0.51%

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKYX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FKGLX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLKYX vs. FKGLX - Dividend Comparison

JLKYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FKGLX's 7.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6
7.97%7.40%5.77%1.58%11.37%10.16%6.18%7.47%12.35%2.66%0.00%0.00%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.19%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JLKYX and FKGLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKGLX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to JLKYX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKYX dropped -32.55% vs FKGLX's -31.23%.

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLKYX and FKGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer