JLKYX vs. FHKDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JLKYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) and FHKDX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, JLKYX returned 10.13%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for FHKDX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JLKYX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FHKDX.

Performance

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLKYX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than FHKDX's 9.12% return.

JLKYX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 29.09%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

FHKDX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 6M: 9.92%
• 1Y: 21.36%
• 3Y*: 15.28%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	12.94%	20.04%	15.41%	18.53%	-18.04%	18.38%	16.13%	25.07%	-11.93%
FHKDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6	9.12%	17.16%	11.51%	15.59%	-17.34%	11.29%	15.45%	22.82%	-9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between JLKYX and FHKDX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.96

The correlation between JLKYX and FHKDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JLKYX vs. FHKDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLKYX

JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 69
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FHKDX

FHKDX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FHKDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FHKDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FHKDX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FHKDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FHKDX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLKYX	FHKDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.50	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.54	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.48	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	3.18	+0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	13.81	+0.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLKYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FHKDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLKYX and FHKDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLKYX	FHKDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.50	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.66	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.74	-0.09

Drawdowns

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLKYX drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than FHKDX's maximum drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLKYX and FHKDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLKYX	FHKDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.55%	-24.65%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-6.85%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.11%	-10.12%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.75%	-24.54%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-5.18%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.57%	+0.49%

Volatility

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX) at 3.11%. This indicates that JLKYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLKYX	FHKDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	3.11%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	7.21%	+2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.05%	8.72%	+3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.21%	10.84%	+4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	12.31%	+3.90%

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLKYX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKDX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JLKYX vs. FHKDX - Dividend Comparison

JLKYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FHKDX's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6	3.71%	3.10%	4.50%	2.36%	5.54%	7.10%	4.65%	3.34%	2.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	3.19%	3.61%	1.77%	2.16%	8.08%	5.71%	3.88%	8.54%	10.69%	4.33%	3.23%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLKYX and FHKDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, JLKYX and FHKDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JLKYX or FHKDX?

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to FHKDX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLKYX dropped -32.55% vs FHKDX's -24.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.