PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLJAX vs. FRIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLJAX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than FRIMX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JLJAX has outperformed FRIMX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while FRIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.


JLJAX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.26%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.33%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
10.82%

FRIMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.27%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLJAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.50%17.82%14.21%17.83%-19.96%15.45%19.87%24.36%-9.27%18.23%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
4.05%9.94%4.30%8.06%-11.66%2.78%8.57%10.57%-1.82%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JLJAX and FRIMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.86

The correlation between JLJAX and FRIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (5 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLJAX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLJAX
JLJAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JLJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JLJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIMX
FRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLJAXFRIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.51

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.05

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

13.04

+0.02

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLJAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FRIMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLJAX and FRIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLJAXFRIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.53

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.94

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.56

-0.15

Drawdowns

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLJAX drawdown since its inception was -56.52%, which is greater than FRIMX's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLJAX and FRIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLJAXFRIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.52%

-33.73%

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-3.44%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.84%

-4.97%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-16.12%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-16.12%

-15.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-3.71%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.80%

+1.28%

Volatility

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) at 1.65%. This indicates that JLJAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLJAXFRIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

1.65%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

3.42%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

4.15%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

5.28%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

4.52%

+11.51%

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLJAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLJAX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison

JLJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, more than FRIMX's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.08%3.11%3.01%2.82%4.52%3.54%2.41%2.56%4.67%8.56%1.67%1.68%
JLJAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
8.22%9.25%3.13%3.11%23.82%8.89%5.40%11.84%14.16%6.67%6.98%6.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLJAX and FRIMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLJAX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FRIMX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLJAX dropped -56.52% vs FRIMX's -33.73%.

FRIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLJAX and FRIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer