JLJAX vs. FCTKX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JLJAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) and FCTKX (Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, JLJAX returned 8.22%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for FCTKX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JLJAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FCTKX.

Performance

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLJAX achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 13.94% return.

JLJAX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 13.33%
• 1Y: 26.69%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

FCTKX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 6M: 15.86%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLJAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	12.50%	17.82%	14.21%	17.83%	-19.96%	15.45%	19.87%	24.36%	-9.27%	7.34%
FCTKX Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6	13.94%	24.06%	14.41%	20.84%	-18.09%	16.86%	18.53%	25.67%	-8.66%	9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JLJAX and FCTKX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017	0.98

The correlation between JLJAX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JLJAX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLJAX

JLJAX Risk / Return Rank: 59
JLJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
JLJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
JLJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
JLJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JLJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FCTKX

FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLJAX	FCTKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.52	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.46	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	3.30	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.06	14.70	-1.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLJAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLJAX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLJAX	FCTKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.52	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.72	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.77	-0.35

Drawdowns

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLJAX drawdown since its inception was -56.52%, which is greater than FCTKX's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLJAX and FCTKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLJAX	FCTKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.52%	-30.94%	-25.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.21%	-9.78%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.84%	-15.40%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.20%	-27.16%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-5.46%	-3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	2.18%	-0.10%

Volatility

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JLJAX) is 3.70%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that JLJAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLJAX	FCTKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	4.27%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	10.54%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.02%	12.80%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	15.05%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	15.89%	+0.14%

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLJAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLJAX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

JLJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, more than FCTKX's 5.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCTKX Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6	5.14%	4.06%	2.31%	2.19%	11.70%	11.47%	4.40%	6.53%	7.08%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%
JLJAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	8.22%	9.25%	3.13%	3.11%	23.82%	8.89%	5.40%	11.84%	14.16%	6.67%	6.98%	6.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLJAX and FCTKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, JLJAX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JLJAX or FCTKX?

FCTKX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to JLJAX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLJAX dropped -56.52% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.