PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLIAX vs. JFIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JLIAX having a 11.32% return and JFIVX slightly higher at 11.56%.


JLIAX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.69%
YTD
11.32%
6M
12.09%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
10.29%

JFIVX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.58%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
11.32%17.06%12.87%16.80%-19.86%14.83%19.46%23.96%-9.08%15.12%
JFIVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust
11.56%17.54%24.61%25.92%-18.30%28.31%18.03%31.05%-5.00%17.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JLIAX and JFIVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.94

The correlation between JLIAX and JFIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLIAX vs. JFIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLIAX
JLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

JFIVX
JFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) and John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLIAXJFIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.35

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

15.64

-2.63

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the JFIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLIAX and JFIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLIAXJFIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.51

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.85

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.83

-0.42

Drawdowns

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLIAX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than JFIVX's maximum drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLIAX and JFIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLIAXJFIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-33.81%

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-8.94%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-18.82%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-24.67%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-4.63%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.90%

+0.03%

Volatility

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio (JLIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust (JFIVX) at 2.83%. This indicates that JLIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLIAXJFIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

2.83%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

8.97%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

11.95%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

16.55%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

18.34%

-3.19%

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLIAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JFIVX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLIAX vs. JFIVX - Dividend Comparison

JLIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, more than JFIVX's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JFIVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust 500 Index Trust
2.29%2.56%2.19%2.44%5.19%5.17%3.38%2.97%2.90%1.27%0.00%0.00%
JLIAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2040 Lifetime Portfolio
8.24%9.18%2.86%2.82%22.31%9.18%5.58%11.19%13.74%6.10%6.95%6.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JLIAX and JFIVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLIAX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to JFIVX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLIAX dropped -56.47% vs JFIVX's -33.81%.

JFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLIAX and JFIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer