JLDAX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JLDAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JLDAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

JLDAX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio (JLDAX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JLDAX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: 3.06%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 1Y: 11.21%
• 3Y*: 9.16%
• 5Y*: 3.98%
• 10Y*: 6.27%
• ALL TIME*: 5.14%

FRQHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JLDAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JLDAX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JLDAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio	5.09%	12.30%	7.00%	11.14%	-15.05%	9.23%	13.18%	4.84%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between JLDAX and FRQHX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.89

The correlation between JLDAX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JLDAX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JLDAX

JLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 65
JLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
JLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JLDAX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio (JLDAX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JLDAX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.07	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	JLDAX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.37%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JLDAX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.87%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.69%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.37%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.86%	—	—

JLDAX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLDAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLDAX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

JLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	2.93%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JLDAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2020 Lifetime Portfolio	5.91%	6.21%	3.47%	3.27%	14.23%	11.32%	7.30%	9.46%	10.82%	5.85%	7.48%	7.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLDAX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

JLDAX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.