JLBAX vs. LTTIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JLBAX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio) and LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, JLBAX returned 6.01%/yr vs 6.24%/yr for LTTIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JLBAX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LTTIX.

Performance

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JLBAX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLBAX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JLBAX having a 6.01% annualized return and LTTIX not far ahead at 6.24%.

JLBAX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 12.77%
• 3Y*: 9.33%
• 5Y*: 4.27%
• 10Y*: 6.01%

LTTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLBAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio	5.21%	11.60%	6.41%	10.55%	-13.60%	8.28%	11.56%	15.93%	-4.97%	8.47%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	17.82%	-3.97%	13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between JLBAX and LTTIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.95

The correlation between JLBAX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JLBAX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLBAX

JLBAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
JLBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
JLBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
JLBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
JLBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JLBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

LTTIX

LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JLBAX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JLBAX	LTTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.16	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.20	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.42	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.47	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.29	10.68	+1.61

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLBAX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLBAX drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, which is greater than LTTIX's maximum drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLBAX and LTTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLBAX	LTTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.29%	-19.33%	-27.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.54%	-3.64%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.54%	-5.77%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.38%	-16.92%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.07%	-19.33%	-0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.45%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-2.68%	-2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.84%	+0.20%

Volatility

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio (JLBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that JLBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLBAX	LTTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	1.34%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.88%	3.32%	+1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.74%	4.18%	+1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.41%	6.37%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.77%	7.24%	+0.53%

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLBAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

JLBAX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

JLBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLBAX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2015 Lifetime Portfolio	6.32%	6.65%	3.59%	3.45%	13.16%	9.37%	7.58%	9.31%	10.96%	5.69%	7.62%	9.15%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLBAX and LTTIX in my portfolio?

JLBAX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLBAX or LTTIX?

JLBAX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLBAX dropped -47.29% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.