JILMX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
JILMX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
JILMX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILMX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILMX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio | -2.06% | 7.55% | 7.62% | 11.53% | -13.82% | 7.82% | 12.24% | 15.66% | -4.93% | 9.30% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 9.23% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILMX achieves a -2.06% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, JILMX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 5.26%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.92% annualized return.
JILMX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -2.06%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.26%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILMX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILMX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JILMX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
JILMX
PUDZX
JILMX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILMX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.98 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 2.57 | -1.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.40 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 2.35 | -1.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 13.15 | -11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILMX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.98 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.88 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.52 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILMX and PUDZX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JILMX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
JILMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than PUDZX's 8.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILMX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio | 3.05% | 3.57% | 3.52% | 4.72% | 9.33% | 8.71% | 5.19% | 6.92% | 7.31% | 5.11% | 5.51% | 6.11% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.17% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
JILMX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILMX drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILMX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILMX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.35% | -21.53% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.87% | -8.20% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.41% | -17.98% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.81% | -21.53% | +1.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -2.44% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -5.31% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.47% | +0.51% |
Volatility
JILMX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) is 2.17%, while PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that JILMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILMX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 2.60% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 6.24% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.31% | 9.70% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.92% | 10.58% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.73% | 9.70% | -1.97% |