JILMX vs. JILCX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX).
JILMX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. JILCX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JILMX or JILCX.
Correlation
The correlation between JILMX and JILCX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JILMX vs. JILCX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JILMX:
1.71
JILCX:
1.92
JILMX:
2.42
JILCX:
2.74
JILMX:
1.32
JILCX:
1.36
JILMX:
0.61
JILCX:
0.77
JILMX:
8.36
JILCX:
8.60
JILMX:
1.18%
JILCX:
0.92%
JILMX:
5.80%
JILCX:
4.16%
JILMX:
-35.56%
JILCX:
-23.44%
JILMX:
-7.23%
JILCX:
-2.50%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILMX achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than JILCX's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, JILMX has underperformed JILCX with an annualized return of 1.66%, while JILCX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.31% annualized return.
JILMX
2.30%
2.98%
4.65%
9.63%
1.70%
1.66%
JILCX
1.62%
2.23%
3.22%
7.94%
1.75%
2.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILMX vs. JILCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILMX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than JILCX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JILMX vs. JILCX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JILMX
JILCX
JILMX vs. JILCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JILMX vs. JILCX - Dividend Comparison
JILMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than JILCX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILMX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio | 3.44% | 3.52% | 3.32% | 3.51% | 3.42% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.20% | 2.86% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 3.37% |
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 4.11% | 4.17% | 3.90% | 4.05% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 4.01% | 3.16% | 2.69% | 2.78% | 3.35% | 3.46% |
Drawdowns
JILMX vs. JILCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILMX drawdown since its inception was -35.56%, which is greater than JILCX's maximum drawdown of -23.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILMX and JILCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JILMX vs. JILCX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) at 1.31%. This indicates that JILMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JILCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.