JILMX vs. DGTSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JILMX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, JILMX returned 5.91%/yr vs 5.21%/yr for DGTSX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JILMX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.

Performance

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILMX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, JILMX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 5.91%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.21% annualized return.

JILMX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 9.45%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 5.91%

DGTSX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 4.30%
• 6M: 4.61%
• 1Y: 10.24%
• 3Y*: 8.53%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 5.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JILMX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio	6.39%	7.55%	7.62%	11.53%	-13.82%	7.82%	12.24%	15.66%	-4.93%	9.30%
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	4.30%	8.39%	7.43%	8.93%	-8.06%	10.20%	7.29%	9.80%	-1.85%	5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between JILMX and DGTSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005	0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between JILMX and DGTSX has dropped to 0.71 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JILMX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILMX

JILMX Risk / Return Rank: 40
JILMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
JILMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
JILMX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
JILMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
JILMX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

DGTSX

DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 89
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JILMX	DGTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	3.07	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	4.63	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.64	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	3.94	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	17.59	-8.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILMX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JILMX	DGTSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	3.07	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.89	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	1.00	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.94	-0.24

Drawdowns

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILMX drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILMX and DGTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JILMX	DGTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.35%	-16.71%	-17.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.84%	-2.64%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.50%	-7.46%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.41%	-11.26%	-8.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.81%	-11.26%	-8.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-1.65%	-2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	0.59%	+1.16%

Volatility

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.14%. This indicates that JILMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JILMX	DGTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	1.14%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.56%	2.73%	+3.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.75%	3.39%	+4.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.03%	5.96%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.81%	5.23%	+2.58%

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILMX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JILMX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

JILMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	5.70%	5.54%	7.28%	4.75%	2.77%	7.62%	2.12%	2.57%	2.99%	1.25%	1.26%	1.50%
JILMX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio	3.07%	3.57%	3.52%	4.72%	9.33%	8.71%	5.19%	6.92%	7.31%	5.11%	5.51%	6.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JILMX and DGTSX in my portfolio?

JILMX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JILMX or DGTSX?

JILMX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to DGTSX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILMX dropped -34.35% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.