PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JILAX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILAX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than FYMIX's 9.13% return.


JILAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.60%
6M
11.51%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
9.82%

FYMIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.23%
6M
8.49%
YTD
9.13%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JILAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio
12.42%3.54%13.76%17.79%-16.77%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
9.13%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JILAX and FYMIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.90

The correlation between JILAX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JILAX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILAX
JILAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
JILAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JILAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
JILAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
JILAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
JILAX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JILAXFYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.31

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

2.18

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.34

9.23

-7.89

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILAX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILAX drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILAX and FYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JILAXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.84%

-22.70%

-35.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-8.80%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.78%

-12.72%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.92%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-5.55%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

2.07%

+3.96%

Volatility

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio (JILAX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) at 4.94%. This indicates that JILAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JILAXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

4.94%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

9.92%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

11.57%

+7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.24%

12.81%

+4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

12.81%

+4.57%

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILAX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JILAX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

JILAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than FYMIX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.38%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JILAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio
1.67%1.87%3.01%6.18%16.17%11.11%6.11%14.22%13.68%7.11%8.43%8.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


JILAX and FYMIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JILAX has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to FYMIX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILAX dropped -57.84% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

FYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JILAX and FYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer