JIJIX vs. JHNBX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX).
JIJIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on May 2, 2019. JHNBX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 9, 1973.
Performance
JIJIX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JIJIX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIJIX John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund | 1.46% | 23.10% | 24.88% | 18.92% | -31.47% | 17.94% | 36.58% | 13.65% |
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | -0.65% | 7.36% | 1.97% | 6.24% | -15.22% | -0.68% | 10.31% | 5.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIJIX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than JHNBX's -0.65% return.
JIJIX
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -10.88%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- —
JHNBX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JIJIX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIJIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JIJIX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank
JIJIX
JHNBX
JIJIX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JIJIX | JHNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.89 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.25 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 4.28 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JIJIX | JHNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.89 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.00 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.75 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between JIJIX and JHNBX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JIJIX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison
JIJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than JHNBX's 3.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIJIX John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund | 2.90% | 2.94% | 0.13% | 0.22% | 0.79% | 30.17% | 5.62% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | 3.96% | 4.25% | 4.14% | 3.80% | 2.93% | 3.30% | 5.50% | 3.75% | 3.51% | 3.23% | 3.19% | 3.48% |
Drawdowns
JIJIX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIJIX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, which is greater than JHNBX's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIJIX and JHNBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIJIX | JHNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -24.74% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.01% | -3.25% | -12.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.80% | -20.13% | -21.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.73% | -3.17% | -9.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -4.15% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 1.05% | +3.01% |
Volatility
JIJIX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) at 1.64%. This indicates that JIJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JIJIX | JHNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.06% | 1.64% | +10.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 2.65% | +14.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 4.48% | +17.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 5.84% | +14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 4.89% | +16.87% |