PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIISX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (JIISX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIISX achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.45% return. Over the past 10 years, JIISX has outperformed GTLOX with an annualized return of 14.49%, while GTLOX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.70% annualized return.


JIISX

1D
-0.21%
1M
4.44%
YTD
6.69%
6M
7.10%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.49%

GTLOX

1D
1.39%
1M
9.29%
YTD
22.45%
6M
24.47%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIISX
JPMorgan U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
6.69%14.34%25.57%25.31%-21.20%30.95%19.74%30.02%-4.76%21.28%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.45%14.39%13.86%16.66%-15.37%27.05%7.41%23.27%-7.97%24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between JIISX and GTLOX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.94

The correlation between JIISX and GTLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIISX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIISX
JIISX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JIISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JIISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (JIISX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIISXGTLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.55

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

5.88

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

25.30

-17.60

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIISX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIISXGTLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

3.17

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.52

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.61

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.50

+0.10

Drawdowns

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIISX drawdown since its inception was -59.25%, which is greater than GTLOX's maximum drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIISX and GTLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIISXGTLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.25%

-54.09%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.03%

-7.47%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.57%

-32.85%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.83%

-32.85%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.26%

-38.15%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-8.33%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.73%

+1.23%

Volatility

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (JIISX) is 3.04%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that JIISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIISXGTLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.25%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

10.36%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

13.88%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

21.86%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

20.91%

-2.48%

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIISX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIISX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

JIISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, less than GTLOX's 14.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.62%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%
JIISX
JPMorgan U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
9.25%9.87%0.75%0.98%1.21%3.96%1.76%7.31%9.03%6.83%1.22%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIISX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to JIISX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIISX dropped -59.25% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIISX and GTLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer