JIII vs. BPH

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JIII (Janus Henderson Income ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JIII is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. JIII charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

JIII vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JIII

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 1.18%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 4.41%
• 1M: -3.74%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIII vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JIII Janus Henderson Income ETF	0.93%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between JIII and BPH is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.31

Return for Risk

JIII vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIII

JIII Risk / Return Rank: 63
JIII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
JIII Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
JIII Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JIII Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
JIII Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIII vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JIII	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.44	—	—

Drawdowns

JIII vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIII drawdown since its inception was -3.55%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIII and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIII	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-15.58%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-6.41%	+5.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-6.77%	+6.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JIII	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.65%	28.88%	-25.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.97%	28.88%	-24.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.97%	28.88%	-24.91%

JIII vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIII has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIII vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

JIII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than BPH's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%
JIII Janus Henderson Income ETF	7.41%	7.33%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIII and BPH in my portfolio?

JIII and BPH have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JIII or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JIII or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for JIII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JIII or BPH?

JIII has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.52% for BPH.

What is the main difference between JIII and BPH?

JIII is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for JIII and 0.19% for BPH.