PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIII vs. ABI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIII vs. ABI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIII achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than ABI's 3.08% return.


JIII

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.18%
YTD
1.43%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.61%
YTD
3.08%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIII vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JIII and ABI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.51

The correlation between JIII and ABI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIII vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIII
JIII Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JIII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIII Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIII Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JIII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIII Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ABI
ABI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ABI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ABI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIII vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIIIABIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

2.01

-0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

5.55

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.44

16.81

-7.37

JIII vs. ABI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIII Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the ABI Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIII and ABI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIII vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIII drawdown since its inception was -3.55%, which is greater than ABI's maximum drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIII and ABI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIIIABIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-0.95%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-0.95%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.05%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.17%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.31%

+0.29%

Volatility

JIII vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) at 0.35%. This indicates that JIII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIIIABIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.35%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

0.81%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

1.28%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.97%

1.26%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

1.26%

+2.71%

JIII vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIII has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIII vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison

JIII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than ABI's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ABI
VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF
6.21%3.01%0.00%
JIII
Janus Henderson Income ETF
7.41%7.33%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIII and ABI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIII has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to ABI (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIII dropped -3.55% vs ABI's -0.95%.

On 1-year performance, JIII leads with 5.69% vs 5.25% for ABI. On fees, JIII is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, ABI has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JIII has performed better with a 5.69% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JIII is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.

JIII has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 6.21% for ABI.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for JIII and 0.65% for ABI.

ABI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIII and ABI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer