PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGMX vs. JAKRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGMX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than JAKRX's 9.01% return.


JIGMX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.28%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
1.60%

JAKRX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.01%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JIGMX and JAKRX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGMX vs. JAKRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGMX
JIGMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
JIGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

JAKRX
JAKRX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JAKRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIGMXJAKRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.48

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.73

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

12.24

-8.49

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the JAKRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGMX and JAKRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGMX drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than JAKRX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGMX and JAKRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGMXJAKRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.82%

-5.16%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-5.16%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-4.26%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-0.86%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.57%

-0.38%

Volatility

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4 (JIGMX) is 1.13%, while John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that JIGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAKRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGMXJAKRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

2.75%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

6.32%

-3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

7.74%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

7.53%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

7.53%

-2.55%

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGMX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKRX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGMX vs. JAKRX - Dividend Comparison

JIGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than JAKRX's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JAKRX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A
7.43%8.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JIGMX
John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund Class R4
4.17%4.10%3.82%2.43%2.57%2.34%4.61%2.92%2.92%2.77%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIGMX and JAKRX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAKRX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to JIGMX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGMX dropped -19.82% vs JAKRX's -5.16%.

JAKRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGMX and JAKRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer