PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGDX vs. FGBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGDX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than FGBRX's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGDX has outperformed FGBRX with an annualized return of 1.69%, while FGBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.05% annualized return.


JIGDX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.65%
6M
-0.29%
YTD
-0.05%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.69%
ALL TIME*
3.33%

FGBRX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.31%
6M
0.26%
YTD
2.94%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
-0.51%
10Y*
0.05%
ALL TIME*
1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
-0.05%8.33%0.42%8.15%-10.84%-1.89%11.65%6.77%-1.71%8.54%
FGBRX
Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R
2.94%14.81%-12.18%2.18%-6.40%-5.30%-4.65%0.38%1.01%2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGDX and FGBRX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2009

0.05

Over the past year, JIGDX and FGBRX have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGDX vs. FGBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JIGDX
JIGDX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JIGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FGBRX
FGBRX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FGBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FGBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIGDXFGBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.14

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

3.22

-1.08

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the FGBRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGDX and FGBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGDX drawdown since its inception was -20.55%, smaller than the maximum FGBRX drawdown of -27.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGDX and FGBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGDXFGBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.55%

-27.46%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-6.38%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.49%

-13.09%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-18.54%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.23%

-27.46%

+8.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-13.74%

+12.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-8.42%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

2.25%

-1.06%

Volatility

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) is 0.96%, while Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that JIGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGDXFGBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.93%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

6.10%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

7.30%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.14%

8.18%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

7.15%

-2.19%

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FGBRX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGDX vs. FGBRX - Dividend Comparison

JIGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than FGBRX's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGBRX
Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R
4.74%4.10%5.49%3.61%4.92%5.11%4.34%5.86%6.27%3.08%2.10%2.85%
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
2.14%3.38%2.32%0.40%5.52%1.24%5.15%3.58%1.36%0.00%0.37%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIGDX and FGBRX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGBRX has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to JIGDX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGDX dropped -20.55% vs FGBRX's -27.46%.

FGBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGDX and FGBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer