FGBRX vs. FTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
FGBRX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 2, 2009. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013.
Performance
FGBRX vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGBRX vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBRX Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R | -2.04% | 14.81% | -12.18% | 2.18% | -6.40% | -5.30% | -4.65% | 0.38% | 1.01% | 2.10% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | -7.30% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGBRX achieves a -2.04% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's -7.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBRX has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of -0.64%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.13% annualized return.
FGBRX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- -2.04%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 8.14%
- 3Y*
- -0.26%
- 5Y*
- -1.63%
- 10Y*
- -0.64%
FTEC
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- -7.30%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.76%
- 10Y*
- 21.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGBRX vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGBRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGBRX vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FGBRX
FTEC
FGBRX vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGBRX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.66 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.81 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 5.63 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGBRX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.59 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | 0.86 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.85 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGBRX and FTEC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGBRX vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
FGBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than FTEC's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBRX Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R | 5.05% | 4.10% | 5.49% | 3.61% | 4.92% | 5.11% | 4.34% | 5.86% | 6.27% | 3.08% | 2.10% | 2.85% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
FGBRX vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGBRX drawdown since its inception was -27.46%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBRX and FTEC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGBRX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.46% | -34.95% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.38% | -16.26% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -34.95% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.46% | -34.95% | +7.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.91% | -12.65% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -5.61% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 5.22% | -3.73% |
Volatility
FGBRX vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Templeton Global Bond Fund - Class R (FGBRX) is 3.50%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that FGBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGBRX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 7.97% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.18% | 16.35% | -11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.61% | 27.51% | -19.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.02% | 25.12% | -17.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.30% | 24.57% | -17.27% |