PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIGDX vs. DFGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGDX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than DFGFX's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, JIGDX has outperformed DFGFX with an annualized return of 2.06%, while DFGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return.


JIGDX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.00%
6M
0.03%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
2.06%

DFGFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.80%
1Y
2.64%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
1.00%8.33%0.42%8.15%-10.84%-1.89%11.65%6.77%-1.71%8.54%
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.60%2.89%5.36%4.95%-2.62%-0.37%0.88%2.87%1.91%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGDX and DFGFX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005

0.26

The correlation between JIGDX and DFGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIGDX vs. DFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGDX
JIGDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JIGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JIGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DFGFX
DFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIGDXDFGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

2.36

-1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.89

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

5.81

+0.96

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the DFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGDX and DFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIGDXDFGFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.69

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

1.28

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

1.34

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

2.29

-1.71

Drawdowns

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGDX drawdown since its inception was -20.55%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGDX and DFGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGDXDFGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.55%

-4.00%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-1.41%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.19%

-2.12%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-4.00%

-15.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.23%

-4.00%

-15.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-0.23%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.46%

+0.50%

Volatility

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (JIGDX) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.25%. This indicates that JIGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGDXDFGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

0.25%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

0.52%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

1.58%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.08%

1.81%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

1.36%

+3.62%

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGFX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIGDX vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison

JIGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than DFGFX's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
3.10%2.67%4.77%3.19%1.17%0.23%0.57%2.24%2.21%1.54%0.65%0.02%
JIGDX
John Hancock Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
2.59%3.38%2.32%0.40%5.52%1.24%5.15%3.58%1.36%0.00%0.37%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIGDX and DFGFX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIGDX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to DFGFX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGDX dropped -20.55% vs DFGFX's -4.00%.

DFGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIGDX and DFGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer