PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIG vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIG vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIG achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 8.06% return.


JIG

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.09%
6M
10.08%
YTD
15.12%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*

WNTR

1D
-0.43%
1M
15.85%
6M
10.45%
YTD
8.06%
1Y
116.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIG vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JIG and WNTR is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIG vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIG
JIG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIG vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIGWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.60

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

6.69

-0.77

JIG vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIG and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIG vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIG drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, roughly equal to the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIG and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.75%

-42.65%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-42.65%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.82%

-11.84%

+7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-20.57%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

16.58%

-13.00%

Volatility

JIG vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) is 8.38%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that JIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

18.80%

-10.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.42%

47.57%

-29.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.47%

53.81%

-33.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

53.62%

-34.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.28%

53.62%

-34.34%

JIG vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIG vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

JIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JIG
JPMorgan International Growth ETF
1.95%2.25%1.70%1.69%0.91%1.35%0.04%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
104.11%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIG and WNTR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to JIG (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIG dropped -43.75% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs 22.27% for JIG. On fees, JIG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, JIG has been the lower-risk option at 8.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs 22.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JIG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 1.95% for JIG.

JIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIG and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIG and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer