PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIG vs. BWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIG vs. BWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIG achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than BWX's -2.00% return.


JIG

1D
0.00%
1M
6.44%
YTD
17.28%
6M
20.72%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*

BWX

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.07%
YTD
-2.00%
6M
-1.69%
1Y
-2.92%
3Y*
0.82%
5Y*
-4.15%
10Y*
-1.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIG vs. BWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JIG
JPMorgan International Growth ETF
17.28%20.10%8.84%13.00%-30.57%6.40%40.04%
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
-2.00%7.67%-5.93%5.10%-19.72%-8.67%11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JIG and BWX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020

0.43

The correlation between JIG and BWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (5 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIG vs. BWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIG
JIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BWX
BWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIG vs. BWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIGBWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.94

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

-0.47

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

-0.92

+8.62

JIG vs. BWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the BWX Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIG and BWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIG vs. BWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIG drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, which is greater than BWX's maximum drawdown of -34.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIG and BWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIGBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.75%

-34.05%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-6.16%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-10.22%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.75%

-30.78%

-12.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-24.05%

+23.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-10.07%

-6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.16%

+0.30%

Volatility

JIG vs. BWX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Growth ETF (JIG) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF (BWX) at 2.38%. This indicates that JIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIGBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.39%

2.38%

+6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.61%

5.97%

+11.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

7.70%

+12.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

9.70%

+9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

8.67%

+10.53%

JIG vs. BWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BWX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIG vs. BWX - Dividend Comparison

JIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than BWX's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Treasury Bond ETF
2.38%2.19%1.99%1.63%1.23%0.93%0.95%1.16%1.07%0.46%
JIG
JPMorgan International Growth ETF
1.92%2.25%1.70%1.69%0.91%1.35%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIG and BWX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIG has higher volatility (8.39%) compared to BWX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIG dropped -43.75% vs BWX's -34.05%.

On 5-year performance, JIG leads with 3.80% vs -4.15% for BWX. On fees, BWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JIG has performed better with a 3.80% return vs -4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JIG.

BWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.92% for JIG.

JIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BWX is International Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIG and 0.35% for BWX.

JIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIG and BWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer