JIEMX vs. PDT
JIEMX (John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund) and PDT (John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund) are both Dividend funds from John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JIEMX returned 5.25%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for PDT. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JIEMX charges 0.76%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for PDT.
Performance
JIEMX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIEMX achieves a 17.10% return, which is significantly higher than PDT's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, JIEMX has underperformed PDT with an annualized return of 5.25%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively higher 5.62% annualized return.
JIEMX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- YTD
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- -17.92%
- 3Y*
- -0.49%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.39%
PDT
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 5.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.46M | $1.42M | $1.61M |
JIEMX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIEMX John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund | 17.10% | -26.66% | 11.75% | 9.49% | -11.75% | 25.29% | 1.07% | 26.44% | -9.78% | 15.46% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 6.22% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between JIEMX and PDT is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005 | 0.43 |
The correlation between JIEMX and PDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JIEMX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank
JIEMX
PDT
JIEMX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund (JIEMX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JIEMX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.09 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.81 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 1.70 | -2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JIEMX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIEMX drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, roughly equal to the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIEMX and PDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIEMX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -62.39% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -5.38% | -30.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -17.14% | -19.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.28% | -40.44% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -62.39% | +22.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.43% | -1.92% | -22.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -9.99% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.94% | 2.56% | +21.38% |
Volatility
JIEMX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund (JIEMX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) at 1.65%. This indicates that JIEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JIEMX | PDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 1.65% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 6.92% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.24% | 8.88% | +29.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 16.92% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 25.09% | -3.57% |
JIEMX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIEMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
JIEMX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison
JIEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than PDT's 7.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIEMX John Hancock Funds II Equity Income Fund | 0.52% | 1.75% | 11.35% | 7.98% | 2.09% | 9.34% | 2.59% | 8.25% | 13.73% | 8.43% | 3.73% | 11.26% |
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.72% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JIEMX and PDT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JIEMX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to PDT (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIEMX dropped -62.26% vs PDT's -62.39%.
PDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JIEMX and PDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer