PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBFX vs. SSAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBFX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than SSAFX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBFX has underperformed SSAFX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while SSAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.82% annualized return.


JIBFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.24%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.82%

SSAFX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
27.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
0.19%7.87%1.21%5.43%-13.69%-2.04%9.71%8.95%0.10%3.73%
SSAFX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio
0.37%6.81%1.34%5.61%-13.30%-1.72%978.57%8.69%-0.12%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBFX and SSAFX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014

0.96

The correlation between JIBFX and SSAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBFX vs. SSAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBFX
JIBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JIBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SSAFX
SSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIBFXSSAFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.35

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

2.02

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.91

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.28

5.88

-0.60

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the SSAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBFX and SSAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIBFXSSAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.35

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.01

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.10

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.09

+0.15

Drawdowns

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SSAFX drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBFX and SSAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBFXSSAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-18.74%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.74%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-6.09%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

-18.10%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.54%

-18.74%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-2.66%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.41%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.89%

+0.12%

Volatility

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Volatility Comparison

Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX) at 1.30%. This indicates that JIBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBFXSSAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.30%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

2.66%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.75%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

5.95%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

277.51%

-272.18%

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAFX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIBFX vs. SSAFX - Dividend Comparison

JIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than SSAFX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
3.93%3.85%3.69%2.92%2.41%1.75%3.11%2.76%2.77%2.52%3.03%2.60%
SSAFX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio
4.17%3.70%3.76%3.16%2.49%1.90%2.41%2.88%2.82%2.42%2.21%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JIBFX and SSAFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIBFX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to SSAFX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBFX dropped -19.54% vs SSAFX's -18.74%.

SSAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBFX and SSAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer