PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHQAX vs. MNHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHQAX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than MNHAX's 2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, JHQAX has outperformed MNHAX with an annualized return of 8.62%, while MNHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.79% annualized return.


JHQAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
8.62%

MNHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.86%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.98%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
6.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHQAX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund
-1.95%7.22%17.93%15.78%-8.27%13.13%13.77%13.38%-0.93%12.45%
MNHAX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I
2.17%6.90%9.29%13.49%-7.38%10.27%6.58%14.25%-0.98%8.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JHQAX and MNHAX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2014

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHQAX vs. MNHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHQAX
JHQAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
JHQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
JHQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

MNHAX
MNHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MNHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MNHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHQAXMNHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.68

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.67

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.46

13.94

-10.48

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHQAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the MNHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHQAX and MNHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHQAXMNHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.88

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.39

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.64

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.68

+0.16

Drawdowns

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHQAX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, smaller than the maximum MNHAX drawdown of -20.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHQAX and MNHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHQAXMNHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-20.13%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-3.10%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.11%

-20.13%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.48%

-20.13%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.82%

-20.13%

+1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-10.70%

+7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-3.51%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

0.59%

+1.40%

Volatility

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund (JHQAX) is 0.49%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) has a volatility of 0.74%. This indicates that JHQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHQAXMNHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.74%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

2.31%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.31%

2.87%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

14.42%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.38%

10.69%

-1.31%

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHQAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than MNHAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHQAX vs. MNHAX - Dividend Comparison

JHQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than MNHAX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHQAX
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Fund
0.37%0.41%0.51%0.74%0.74%0.50%0.89%1.18%0.92%0.76%1.11%0.97%
MNHAX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I
6.36%7.29%7.02%8.59%7.61%9.81%6.26%8.24%6.38%6.20%7.68%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHQAX and MNHAX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNHAX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to JHQAX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHQAX dropped -18.82% vs MNHAX's -20.13%.

MNHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHQAX and MNHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer