JHLN vs. JHDV

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) and JHDV (John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHLN charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for JHDV.

Performance

JHLN vs. JHDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHLN achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than JHDV's 16.21% return.

JHLN

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHDV

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 16.02%
• 1Y: 31.44%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHLN vs. JHDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF	0.64%	1.51%
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	16.21%	4.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JHLN and JHDV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

JHLN vs. JHDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDV

JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 83
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHLN vs. JHDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN) and John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHLN	JHDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	1.31	-0.28

Drawdowns

JHLN vs. JHDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHLN drawdown since its inception was -1.46%, smaller than the maximum JHDV drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHLN and JHDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHLN	JHDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-18.97%	+17.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-3.16%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-2.62%	+2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JHLN	JHDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67%	11.97%	-9.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.67%	15.72%	-13.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.67%	15.72%	-13.05%

JHLN vs. JHDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHLN has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JHDV's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHLN vs. JHDV - Dividend Comparison

JHLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than JHDV's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	2.03%	2.40%	2.50%	2.77%	0.85%
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF	3.86%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHLN and JHDV in my portfolio?

JHLN and JHDV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JHLN or JHDV?

On fees, JHDV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHLN or JHDV?

JHDV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JHLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHLN or JHDV?

JHLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.03% for JHDV.

What is the main difference between JHLN and JHDV?

JHLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while JHDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JHLN and 0.34% for JHDV.