JHLN vs. FLRT
JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JHLN charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
JHLN vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHLN achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 2.55% return.
JHLN
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLRT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.77M | $4.99M | $4.79M | |
| $516.28K | $875.26K | $636.78K |
JHLN vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.51% | 1.55% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.55% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHLN and FLRT is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHLN vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
JHLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLRT
JHLN vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHLN | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHLN vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHLN drawdown since its inception was -1.46%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHLN and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHLN | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -20.96% | +19.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -1.39% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.48% | — |
Volatility
JHLN vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHLN | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65% | 1.50% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 2.30% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 6.09% | -3.44% |
JHLN vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHLN has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHLN vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
JHLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than FLRT's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.71% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF | 4.88% | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHLN and FLRT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JHLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JHLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 4.88% for JHLN.
They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JHLN and 0.60% for FLRT.
Find the right allocation for JHLN and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer