JHHBX vs. SVBAX
JHHBX (John Hancock High Yield Fund) and SVBAX (John Hancock Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - JHHBX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by John Hancock, while SVBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JHHBX returned 4.44%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for SVBAX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHHBX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for SVBAX.
Performance
JHHBX vs. SVBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHHBX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than SVBAX's 10.51% return. Over the past 10 years, JHHBX has underperformed SVBAX with an annualized return of 4.44%, while SVBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.
JHHBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
SVBAX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 10.51%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
JHHBX vs. SVBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHHBX John Hancock High Yield Fund | 1.50% | 7.21% | 5.45% | 10.85% | -12.64% | 4.71% | 4.62% | 13.46% | -3.38% | 6.81% |
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | 10.51% | 15.69% | 13.31% | 18.22% | -15.79% | 14.49% | 15.97% | 21.28% | -5.02% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHHBX and SVBAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1993 | 0.45 |
The correlation between JHHBX and SVBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHHBX vs. SVBAX — Risk / Return Rank
JHHBX
SVBAX
JHHBX vs. SVBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock High Yield Fund (JHHBX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHHBX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 4.19 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 20.06 | -8.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHHBX vs. SVBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHHBX drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than SVBAX's maximum drawdown of -40.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHHBX and SVBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHHBX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -40.81% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -5.57% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.73% | -12.06% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.85% | -20.53% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.01% | -21.00% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.06% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -5.23% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 1.16% | -0.60% |
Volatility
JHHBX vs. SVBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock High Yield Fund (JHHBX) is 1.10%, while John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that JHHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHHBX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 3.50% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 7.05% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 8.69% | -4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 10.86% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.76% | 10.83% | -5.07% |
JHHBX vs. SVBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHHBX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than SVBAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHHBX vs. SVBAX - Dividend Comparison
JHHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than SVBAX's 11.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHHBX John Hancock High Yield Fund | 6.56% | 6.28% | 4.95% | 4.41% | 4.87% | 4.32% | 4.82% | 5.33% | 5.80% | 5.45% | 6.12% | 7.24% |
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | 11.30% | 12.45% | 3.72% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 2.73% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 8.06% | 3.51% | 1.70% | 4.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHHBX and SVBAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVBAX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to JHHBX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHHBX dropped -58.87% vs SVBAX's -40.81%.
SVBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHHBX and SVBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer