PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHHBX vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHHBX vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock High Yield Fund (JHHBX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHHBX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than JGH's 6.08% return. Over the past 10 years, JHHBX has underperformed JGH with an annualized return of 4.50%, while JGH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return.


JHHBX

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.26%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.04%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
4.50%

JGH

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.33%
YTD
6.08%
6M
7.53%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
8.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHHBX vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHHBX
John Hancock High Yield Fund
1.50%7.21%5.45%10.85%-12.64%4.71%4.62%13.46%-3.38%6.81%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
6.08%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-12.02%15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JHHBX and JGH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2014

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHHBX vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHHBX
JHHBX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JHHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JHHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHHBX vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock High Yield Fund (JHHBX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHHBXJGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.44

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

3.49

+8.02

JHHBX vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHHBX and JGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHHBX vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHHBX drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than JGH's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHHBX and JGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHHBXJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-43.79%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-8.37%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.73%

-13.70%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.85%

-28.66%

+12.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.01%

-43.79%

+20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.16%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-6.98%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

3.44%

-2.88%

Volatility

JHHBX vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock High Yield Fund (JHHBX) is 1.16%, while Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that JHHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHHBXJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

3.13%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

7.27%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

10.28%

-6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

13.80%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

15.87%

-10.11%

JHHBX vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHHBX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHHBX vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

JHHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than JGH's 9.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.74%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%
JHHBX
John Hancock High Yield Fund
6.56%6.28%4.95%4.41%4.87%4.32%4.82%5.33%5.80%5.45%6.12%7.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHHBX and JGH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGH has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to JHHBX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHHBX dropped -58.87% vs JGH's -43.79%.

JHHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHHBX and JGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer