PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHGPX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JHGPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHGPX achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's 8.84% return.


JHGPX

1D
1.37%
1M
-1.02%
6M
4.58%
YTD
6.96%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.86%

TSAIX

1D
2.37%
1M
-0.37%
6M
5.88%
YTD
8.84%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
11.59%
ALL TIME*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHGPX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Growth Portfolio
6.96%16.48%11.30%17.11%-15.89%14.08%13.49%21.44%-6.11%11.03%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
8.84%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%18.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JHGPX and TSAIX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.93

The correlation between JHGPX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHGPX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHGPX
JHGPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JHGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JHGPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHGPXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

1.81

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

7.59

+0.94

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHGPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHGPX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHGPX drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHGPX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHGPXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-34.58%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-10.28%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-17.29%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-28.28%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-1.63%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-4.88%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.44%

-0.66%

Volatility

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JHGPX) is 3.04%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that JHGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHGPXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.30%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

11.82%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

14.29%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

16.43%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.49%

17.61%

-3.12%

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHGPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JHGPX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

JHGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.67%, more than TSAIX's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHGPX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Lifestyle Growth Portfolio
9.67%10.34%6.09%15.66%17.94%9.17%7.49%6.31%3.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.78%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JHGPX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSAIX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to JHGPX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHGPX dropped -26.14% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

JHGPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHGPX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer