PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHDV vs. MDLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHDV vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHDV achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than MDLV's 10.68% return.


JHDV

1D
-1.41%
1M
1.19%
YTD
17.56%
6M
16.88%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
21.41%
5Y*
10Y*

MDLV

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.67%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHDV vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
17.56%14.76%20.25%14.84%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
10.68%13.30%10.16%-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between JHDV and MDLV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2023

0.58

The correlation between JHDV and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHDV vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDV
JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHDV vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHDVMDLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.55

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

14.09

+0.82

JHDV vs. MDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the MDLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHDV and MDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHDV vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHDV drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDV and MDLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHDVMDLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-10.71%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-4.27%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-10.71%

-8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-1.44%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-2.27%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.37%

+0.65%

Volatility

JHDV vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) at 3.01%. This indicates that JHDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHDVMDLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.01%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

6.74%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

8.95%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

10.52%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

10.52%

+5.19%

JHDV vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHDV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHDV vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison

JHDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than MDLV's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
2.01%2.40%2.50%2.77%0.85%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.79%3.00%2.78%2.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHDV and MDLV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHDV has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to MDLV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHDV dropped -18.97% vs MDLV's -10.71%.

On 3-year performance, JHDV leads with 21.41% vs 13.01% for MDLV. On fees, JHDV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, MDLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JHDV has performed better with a 21.41% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHDV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.01% for JHDV.

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for JHDV and 0.58% for MDLV.

JHDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHDV and MDLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer