JHDV vs. JHAC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC).

JHDV and JHAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHDV is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Sep 27, 2022. JHAC is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 1, 2023.

Performance

JHDV vs. JHAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JHDV vs. JHAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	1.76%	14.76%	20.25%	10.52%
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	-8.94%	3.33%	23.65%	15.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHDV achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than JHAC's -8.94% return.

JHDV

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -4.40%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 19.29%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHAC

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -4.83%
• YTD: -8.94%
• 6M: -10.22%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHDV vs. JHAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHDV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than JHAC's 0.72% expense ratio.

JHAC

John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

JHDV

John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF

Return for Risk

JHDV vs. JHAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDV

JHDV Risk / Return Rank: 59
JHDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
JHDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
JHDV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
JHDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
JHDV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

JHAC

JHAC Risk / Return Rank: 17
JHAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
JHAC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
JHAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
JHAC Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHDV vs. JHAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHDV	JHAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.20	+0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	0.43	+1.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.06	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	0.28	+1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	0.87	+5.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHDV vs. JHAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the JHAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHDV and JHAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHDV	JHAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	0.20	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.74	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between JHDV and JHAC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

JHDV vs. JHAC - Dividend Comparison

JHDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than JHAC's 0.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JHDV John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF	2.32%	2.40%	2.50%	2.77%	0.85%
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF	0.63%	0.58%	0.66%	0.17%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JHDV vs. JHAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHDV drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum JHAC drawdown of -24.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDV and JHAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHDV	JHAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-24.43%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.22%	-15.24%	+2.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.48%	-12.33%	+6.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-3.80%	+1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	4.81%	-2.00%

Volatility

JHDV vs. JHAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV) is 4.85%, while John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that JHDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHDV	JHAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	5.26%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	10.27%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.85%	20.29%	-2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	17.78%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	17.78%	-1.93%