JHDG vs. JHAC
JHDG (John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF) and JHAC (John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHDG is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JHDG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for JHAC.
Performance
JHDG vs. JHAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JHDG
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
JHAC
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- -0.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.49K | $3.48K | $6.12K | |
| $1.11M | $1.05M | $1.10M |
JHDG vs. JHAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JHDG John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF | 5.74% |
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF | 7.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHDG and JHAC is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.49 |
JHDG vs. JHAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHDG
JHAC
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Technology
JHDG
JHAC
Consumer Cyclical
JHDG
JHAC
Healthcare
JHDG
JHAC
Financial Services
JHDG
JHAC
Industrials
JHDG
JHAC
Communication Services
JHDG
JHAC
Consumer Defensive
JHDG
JHAC
Energy
JHDG
JHAC
Basic Materials
JHDG
JHAC
Real Estate
JHDG
JHAC
Utilities
JHDG
JHAC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHDG vs. JHAC — Risk / Return Rank
JHDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JHAC
JHDG vs. JHAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHDG | JHAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHDG vs. JHAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHDG drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum JHAC drawdown of -24.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDG and JHAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHDG | JHAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -24.43% | +21.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -4.68% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -3.96% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility
JHDG vs. JHAC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHDG | JHAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 13.45% | -3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 17.21% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 17.21% | -7.05% |
JHDG vs. JHAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHDG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than JHAC's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHDG vs. JHAC - Dividend Comparison
JHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than JHAC's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.66% | 0.17% |
JHDG John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHDG and JHAC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JHDG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JHDG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for JHAC.
JHAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.10% for JHDG.
JHDG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while JHAC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHDG and 0.72% for JHAC.
Find the right allocation for JHDG and JHAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer