JHCP vs. RFDI
JHCP (John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF) and RFDI (First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while RFDI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JHCP returned 6.12% vs 23.94% for RFDI. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHCP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for RFDI.
Performance
JHCP vs. RFDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHCP achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than RFDI's 7.65% return.
JHCP
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFDI
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
JHCP vs. RFDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JHCP John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.33% | 7.59% | -0.30% |
RFDI First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF | 7.65% | 35.95% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCP and RFDI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCP vs. RFDI — Risk / Return Rank
JHCP
RFDI
JHCP vs. RFDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) and First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHCP | RFDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 2.36 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 8.55 | -2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHCP | RFDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.67 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.49 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
JHCP vs. RFDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCP drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum RFDI drawdown of -39.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCP and RFDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCP | RFDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -39.40% | +36.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -10.20% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -2.51% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -9.24% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 2.81% | -1.83% |
Volatility
JHCP vs. RFDI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) is 1.37%, while First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that JHCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCP | RFDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 4.65% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 11.90% | -8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27% | 14.39% | -10.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 16.76% | -11.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 17.36% | -12.53% |
JHCP vs. RFDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDI's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCP vs. RFDI - Dividend Comparison
JHCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than RFDI's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCP John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.66% | 4.79% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFDI First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF | 3.28% | 3.45% | 5.21% | 2.43% | 5.00% | 3.22% | 1.34% | 2.72% | 2.59% | 1.63% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCP and RFDI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFDI has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to JHCP (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCP dropped -3.06% vs RFDI's -39.40%.
On 1-year performance, RFDI leads with 23.94% vs 6.12% for JHCP. On fees, JHCP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, JHCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RFDI has performed better with a 23.94% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHCP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFDI.
JHCP has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.28% for RFDI.
JHCP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while RFDI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for JHCP and 0.83% for RFDI.
RFDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHCP and RFDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer