JHBSX vs. JIJIX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JHBSX (John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6) and JIJIX (John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - JHBSX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JIJIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 5 years, JHBSX returned 0.01%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for JIJIX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHBSX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for JIJIX.

Performance

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHBSX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than JIJIX's 25.29% return.

JHBSX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 5.73%
• 3Y*: 4.30%
• 5Y*: 0.01%
• 10Y*: 2.42%

JIJIX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 25.29%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: 27.09%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JHBSX John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6	0.42%	7.79%	2.10%	5.10%	-14.95%	-0.31%	10.74%	5.66%
JIJIX John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund	25.29%	23.10%	24.88%	18.92%	-31.47%	17.94%	36.58%	13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between JHBSX and JIJIX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019	0.18

The correlation between JHBSX and JIJIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JHBSX vs. JIJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHBSX

JHBSX Risk / Return Rank: 24
JHBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
JHBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
JHBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
JHBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
JHBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

JIJIX

JIJIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
JIJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
JIJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
JIJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JIJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
JIJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHBSX	JIJIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.62	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.27	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	2.35	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	9.23	-4.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the JIJIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHBSX and JIJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHBSX	JIJIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	1.62	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.52	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.73	0.00

Drawdowns

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHBSX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum JIJIX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHBSX and JIJIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHBSX	JIJIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.78%	-41.80%	+22.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-16.01%	+12.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.35%	-18.04%	+10.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	-41.80%	+22.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-0.60%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-11.41%	+7.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	4.08%	-3.02%

Volatility

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) is 1.46%, while John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund (JIJIX) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that JHBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHBSX	JIJIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.46%	9.72%	-8.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.00%	20.54%	-17.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.10%	23.22%	-19.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	20.47%	-14.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	22.09%	-17.13%

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHBSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JIJIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHBSX vs. JIJIX - Dividend Comparison

JHBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than JIJIX's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHBSX John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6	4.72%	4.65%	4.20%	2.78%	3.31%	3.67%	5.89%	4.15%	3.93%	3.65%	3.62%	3.92%
JIJIX John Hancock International Dynamic Growth Fund	2.35%	2.94%	0.13%	0.22%	0.79%	30.17%	5.62%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHBSX and JIJIX in my portfolio?

JHBSX and JIJIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHBSX or JIJIX?

JIJIX has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to JHBSX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHBSX dropped -19.78% vs JIJIX's -41.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.